| About NNN |
Since March 2005, New Nebraska Network has been the state's premier source of progressive online political commentary and community-building.
Please support our efforts by becoming engaged, spreading the word, and contributing what you can towards our continued growth as a voice for change in Nebraska politics.
|
| Poll |
| What interests you the most at the Nebraska Democratic Party's 2010 State Convention being held this weekend in Columbus? |
|
|
|
Results
|
|
Sat Apr 26, 2008 at 17:13:40 PM CDT
|
I'd actually posted this week's poll before reading the following article. After asking "Was the Caucus Worth It?" earlier in the week, the Omaha World-Herald again turns the spotlight on Nebraska Democrats and delves further into the question of whether or not the results of the May 13th primary will have any meaning in this ongoing Democratic presidential race:
Let's be clear from the start: Democrats in Nebraska will see the names of both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton on the May 13 primary ballot, but the results officially will be meaningless. Nebraska Democrats held Feb. 9 presidential caucuses that Obama won overwhelmingly, and those are the Nebraska results that count as the two candidates battle for the party's nomination.
But just because the primary amounts to little more than a state opinion poll doesn't mean the results won't end up as part of the big battle of political spin that the Democratic race has in many ways devolved into...Some think it's possible Nebraska's primary could be used in that debate.
"Two names will be on the ballot, they will count the votes, and there will be a winner and a loser," said Vince Powers of Lincoln, Nebraska Democratic national committeeman. "I just don't think the winner is going to say, 'It didn't matter.' "
That would be especially true if Clinton does well, Powers said. Winning the Nebraska primary would support her argument that caucuses are not a fair representation of the electorate and that she recently has gained momentum in the nomination battle. But others aren't sure whether anyone outside Nebraska will be paying attention to the nonbinding vote.
"I'm sure there will be people making every argument you can imagine," said Steve Achelpohl, Nebraska's Democratic Party chairman. "It's interesting conversation, but it's an irrelevant debate." |
| Kyle Michaelis :: Opposing Viewpoints On May 13th Primary's Presidential Impact |
Both campaigns are aware of the coming Nebraska primary. Powers contacted both a month ago to make sure. Neither expressed any interest in getting involved. "Their reaction is Nebraska is done," he said....
Nebraska's primary undoubtedly will bring out more Democrats than the more than 38,000 caucus participants. The 2004 Democratic presidential primary counted more than 71,000 voters, even though Sen. John Kerry already had clinched the nomination by then.....
But Randy Adkins, a political science professor at the University of Nebraska at Omaha, said he doubted that even a Clinton victory in the Nebraska primary would influence the politicking for superdelegate support...The biggest role of the Nebraska primary vote, he said, likely will be to fuel debate among Democrats over whether they will again use a caucus in 2012 or go back to having a primary....
Powers said he doesn't think anyone can predict whether the Nebraska vote will prove meaningless until it actually happens. "It's been a crazy year," he said. "It's just one more crazy thing that occurs."
The fact that neither presidential campaign has shown any interest in Nebraska's primary doesn't change the fact that it will be useful in either bolstering or refuting Hillary Clinton's claim that Barack Obama's caucus victories have been unrepresentative of Democratic voters. Neither campaign is willing to acknowledge as much because it's not in their interest to legitimize Nebraska's vote until they know the results.
You really have to commend Powers for doing what he can to make sure Nebraska Democrats recognize the stakes and make their voice heard a second time in this election. That doesn't mean Achelpohl is wrong protecting the legitimacy of the caucus. If anything, the fact that people are even engaging in this discussion is just further evidence of the caucus' success.
On February 9th, the voice of Nebraska Democrats mattered in a presidential race for the first time in decades. On May 13th, their voice might matter once again in the same election. That's an unheard-of, once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. I just hope Nebraska Democrats take advantage and have some fun with it. |
|
New Nebraska Network
Not Just Red to Blue - More than One Label for Another
|
| 101st Legislature |
|
|
|