About NNN
Since March 2005, New Nebraska Network has been the state's premier source of progressive online political commentary and community-building.

Please support our efforts by becoming engaged, spreading the word, and contributing what you can towards our continued growth as a voice for change in Nebraska politics.


Join the Network

Frontpage RSS Feed

Diaries RSS Feed

Daily E-mail Updates

Read NNN Archives
(pre-August 2007)

Managing Editor:
Kyle Michaelis,
kyle@newnebraska.net

NNN is a meritocracy. Contribute and you will be rewarded.

Poll
What interests you the most at the Nebraska Democratic Party's 2010 State Convention being held this weekend in Columbus?
Gubernatorial nomination (if contested)
State Chair's race (if contested)
Debate of new platform and resolutions
Fate of 2012 presidential caucus
George McGovern speaking at dinner
Not going and not interested

Results

Search




Advanced Search


Event Calendar
July 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * * 01 02 03
04 05 06 07 08 09 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
* * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Local Blog Roll
  • Neal Obermeyer 'Toons
  • Paul Fell Cartoons
  • Bill Dunn Cartoons
  • NE Appleseed Blog
  • Blog for Rural America
  • NDP Blog for Nebraska
  • Omaha Blog
  • BJ Nebraska
  • Freedom Road Project
  • Lincolnite
  • Public Christian
  • The Dark Stuff
  • Revolution-21
  • The Watchdog Post
  • Scenic Route (GI Ind.)
  • AgLines (GI Ind.)
  • Omaha TV News
  • Harold W. Andersen
  • Nebraska Watchdog
  • Leavenworth Street
  • Objective Conservative
  • Red State Eclectic
  • Heartland Notebook
  • Weird Harold
  • Don't Let Me Stop You
  • Economic Trends
  • Right-Wing Professor
  • Art Diamond Blog
  • Vital Signs
  • Domestic Divapalooza
  • Unicam Watch (Rep.)
  • Grassroots In NE
  • Patriotic Resistance
  • From The Heartland
  • Nebraska Redneck
  • One Out In The Third
  • Plains Feeder
  • Mark Fahleson

  • 50 State Blog Network
  • Alabama
  • Arizona
  • California
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • DailyKos
  • Firedoglake
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Idaho
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Iowa
  • Louisiana
  • Maine
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • Missouri
  • Montana
  • MyDD
  • Nebraska
  • Nevada
  • New Hampshire
  • New Jersey
  • New Mexico
  • New York (a)
  • New York (b)
  • North Carolina
  • North Dakota
  • Ohio (a)
  • Ohio (b)
  • Oklahoma
  • Open Left
  • Oregon
  • Pennsylvania
  • Rhode Island
  • Swing State Project
  • Tennessee
  • Texas (a)
  • Texas (b)
  • Utah
  • Vermont
  • Virginia
  • Washington
  • West Virginia
  • Wisconsin

  • What Has Lee Terry Actually Authored and Passed?

    by: Lisa Hannah

    Mon Jun 30, 2008 at 16:18:14 PM CDT


    (Now updated, debunking Terry's false claim to have "authored" the fuel cell legislation.  Great work, Lisa!   - promoted by Kyle Michaelis)

    I've noticed we have a Lee Terry supporter in our midst lately that seems to think that Lee Terry is some great leader who has done great things in the House of Representatives. He/She has claimed hat Terry has "authored" and passed 7 bills. So I decided to take a closer look at Terry's record.

    When someone says "authored", that means that person was the "Sponsor" on the bill. Not Co-Sponsor, not someone who submitted an amendment, but Sponsored the bill. When you go to THOMAS, which is the website that provides all activities in the House and Senate, you find out a pattern very quickly. When you look at a bill, it will list the number, the title, and then the name of the Sponsor.

    Then there is the claim of "bills passed" itself. A "Bill" is something that has to pass in both the House and Senate, and then is signed into Law by the President of the United States.

    Then there are Resolutions. There are Resolutions, Concurrent Resolutions, and Joint Resolutions. Resolutions are only passed in the chamber where it was introduced. Concurrent Resolutions are used when the same resolution is introduced in both chambers at the same time. A Joint Resolution is then a resolution that is introduced in one chamber, but passed in both, similar to a bill. All resolutions are then just printed into the official record. They are not laws.

    Finally, there are Amendments, which are just added into bills or resolutions during debate.

    When the supporters of Terry claim 7 "Bills", are they meaning those that became laws?

    But what does THOMAS say about Terry's record? Here's a list of everything passed that lists Terry as the "Sponsor".

    Lisa Hannah :: What Has Lee Terry Actually Authored and Passed?
    106th CONGRESS

    The official record shows that Terry sponsored and passed one bill:

      H.R.4615 - To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3030 Meredith Avenue in Omaha, Nebraska, as the "Reverend J.C. Wade Post Office".

    It became Public Law No: 106-340.

    Terry also introduced and passed 4 Amendments.

    Under H.R.2670 (Appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes), he sponsored and passed the following amendment:

      H.AMDT.402 - An amendment to increase funding by $2 million for repair of Merchant Marine Academy buildings.

    But while he passed that amendment, the final bill was vetoed successfully by President Clinton. Therefore, that amendment didn't get signed into law.

    Under H.R.1993 (To reauthorize the Overseas Private Investment Corporation and the Trade and Development Agency, and for other purposes), Terry introduced and passed 3 Amendments. However, 2 of them had the language amended by another members language. So while Terry still had his name on them, they were not his original work:

      H.AMDT.517 - Amendment no. 9 printed in the Congressional Record to specify that OPIC address concerns that it does not promptly dispose of legitimate claims regarding projects that it insures or guarantees and recognize that private parties face financial obligations that cannot be deferred indefinitely.

      H.AMDT.523 - Amendment originally sought to require OPIC to settle claims within 90 days, allow a 60 day extension for receipt of supplemental information, and pay interest at the prime rate for each day after the specified time limit.As amended by the Menendez amendment, the above was replaced with language that requires GAO to submit to Congress a report which reviews the claims activities of OPIC.

      H.AMDT.525 - Amendment requires that OPIC publish and report to Congress any intervention by other departments or agencies of the U.S. government regarding the timing or settlement of any claim arising as a result of insurance, reinsurance, or guaranty operations. As amended by the Menendez amendment, language was added that clarifies that the interventions requiring public disclosure are those that intend to impede or delay.

    The bill itself, however, was sent to the Senate and never received any further action in that chamber. Therefore it died, and was never passed into law, along with the amendments by Terry. So, in the 106th Congress, Terry passed ONE BILL into law. That's it.

    107th CONGRESS

    Terry did not pass any bills during this Congress. He passed only one Resolution:

      H.RES.298 - Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Veterans Day should continue to be observed on November 11 and separate from any other Federal holiday or day for Federal elections or national observances.

    108th CONGRESS

    During this Congress, Terry did not pass any bills.

    Terry passed 1 Resolution:

      H.RES.284 - Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the House.

    Terry introduced this to nominate Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R-Texas) to the Committees on Agriculture, Committee on Resources, and Committee on Science. He also nominated Rep. Thaddeus McCotter (R-Michigan) to the Committee on Small Business.

    Terry also introduced and passed one Amendment to H.R.2555 (Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Bill):

      H.AMDT.179 - Amendment increases funding for first responders by $20 million with $10 million for grants to State and local law enforcement for terrorism prevention activities and $10 million for firefighter assistance grants with offsets of $20 million from the Transportation Security Administration.

    This was in 2003, just after the Iraq war started, and when it had become clear on 9/11 that the TSA needed much more funding and coverage to protect the airports and airplanes. This took away money from the TSA.

    But let's look closer at that amendment, what his amendment did to move the money around, and what the final bill actually contained.

    First, his amendment reduced the Aviation Security budget by $20 Million, dropping it to $3,659,200,000. However, the final amount approved was $3,732,700,000.

    Next, it increased the Domestic Preparedness budget by $10 Million to $3,513,000,000. However, the final amount approved was $3,287,000,000.

    Next, the amendment, under the Domestic Preparedness budget, designated that additional $10 Million to state and local, for a total of $510,000,000.  However, the final amount was the original $500,000,000, and a provision was added that states could only request funds after submitting an updated state plan.

    Finally, his amendment increased firefighter assistance grants by $10 Million to $760,000,000. However the final bill reduced it back to $750 Million.

    So, in short, none of what Terry got passed in the House survived to the final bill. It was clear that in the final version, the majority must have felt that reducing funds to the TSA may not be a good idea.

    109th CONGRESS

    Terry did not pass any Bills or Resolutions during this Congress. He passed 1 Amendment, however.

    Under H.R.5522 (Appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs), Terry passed the following amendment:

      H.AMDT.994 - To limit funds in the bill for use in contravention of laws regarding importation of counterfeit goods and services.

    However, the bill was sent to the Senate and never went any further. Therefore, that amendment was never in the final bill or signed into law.

    110th CONGRESS

    In the 110th Congress so far, Terry has not passed any bills into law. He has had 3 Resolutions passed:

      H.RES.541 - Recognizing the Marines of Company M (or "Mike Company") of the 3rd Battalion, 7th Regiment, 1st Marine Division on the occasion of their 25th Annual Reunion.

      H.RES.856 - Expresses heartfelt sympathy for the victims and families of the shootings in Omaha, Nebraska, on Wednesday, December 5, 2007.

      H.RES.1283 - Expressing heartfelt sympathy for the victims and their families following the tornado that hit Little Sioux, Iowa, on June 11, 2008.

    Terry had 3 Amendments so far.

    Under H.R.1684 - (Department of Homeland Security Appropriations), Terry introduced the following amendment:

      H.AMDT.155 - To require the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to consult with states prior to sharing information on forthcoming grant awards, including when sharing information with the U.S. Congress.

    However, H.R.1684 was the not the Department of Homeland Security appropations bills that went through all the way. Instead, it was H.R.2638, which later was merged with the Omnibus (Consolidated) Appropriations Bill, H.R.2764. The amendment language or intent was not in the final version signed into law.

    Under H.R.2446 - (To reauthorize the Afghanistan Freedom Support Act of 2002), Terry passed the following amendment:

      H.AMDT.247 - Amendment provides that the U.S. Agency for International Development should give priority in awarding grants to non-governmental organizations to aid in the revitalization of Afghanistan to organizations based in the United States that have an established and cost-effective record of developing and administering such programs within Afghanistan.

    However, the bill itself went to the Senate and has never gone any further. Therefore, the amendment has not become law.

    Under H.R.3221 (housing reform),  Terry introduced the following Amendment:

      H.AMDT.747 - To add a section to accelerate the adoption of geothermal heat pumps by the Federal government.

    As a member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, this was one of the issues that was put forth. The language was greatly reduced as this bill was merged into H.R.6, but the spirit remained. It became Public Law No: 110-140.

    FINAL SUMMARY

    So, from the time Terry took office in January 1999, to the present date, he passed:

    • 1 Bill, renaming a post office.

    • 5 Resolutions, on continuing to observe Veteran's Day on November 11th, naming 2 fellow Republicans to committees, recognizing the Marines of Company M for their 25th Annual Reunion, expressing sympathy to the Omaha mall shooting victims, and expressing sympathy to the Little Sioux tornado victims.

    • 1 Amendment, accelerating adoption of geothermal heat pumps.

    The ONE Bill and the ONE Amendment are all that have become actual laws.

    Now, I know those Terry supporters are wanting to claim some things for Terry. Okay. Then lets see that list. Lets see the bill numbers so we can do our research and make sure that they are telling the truth. After all, if they are telling the truth, why would they have a problem with that request? Here's their chance to show pride in their guy.

    But according to the official record, Terry has been the SPONSOR (aka Author) of things that have had no tangible benefit to the people of his district.

    ===========================

    UPDATED 7/2/2008 - FUEL CELL CLAIM

    research and development for fuel cells. This is under the Advanced Power system Technology Incentives Program. The funding and program requirements were Terry's idea; he conceptualized it, he offered the proposal in committee and it was adopted. The full bill then went on to pass--with this Terry law as part of it (Public Law 109-58, Title VII).

    Now for the full story.

    H.R.6 was the Bill that was made into the final law. However, H.R.1640, which was a product of the Energy and Commerce Committee (which Terry is on), was folded into the final bill.

    Prior to that, however, a hearing on energy policy was held on February 9 2005, Terry is listed as present, but he doesn't ask one single question about fuel cells. He doesn't even submit a pre-written statement. However, Doyle of Pennsylvania does both, and focuses heavily on fuel cells.

    The Energy and Commerce Committee held a hearing on their version of the bill on April 13, 2005.  During that hearing, Terry introduced two amendments, but only one survived.

    The Amendment Terry offered (with Doyle of Pennsylvania) was simple, and reflected only change in fund amounts for the entire program:

    In section 809, amend paragraphs (1) through (5)
    to read as follows:
    (1) $546,000,000 for fiscal year 2006;
    (2) $750,000,000 for fiscal year 2007;
    (3) $850,000,000 for fiscal year 2008;
    (4) $900,000,000 for fiscal year 2009; and
    (5) $1,000,000,000 for fiscal year 2010.

    That's it. They took already proposed funding and increased it. Matter of fact, a report that mentioned Terry and this issue at the time stated:

    "An amendment offered by Reps. Lee Terry (R-NE) and Mike Doyle (D-PA) doubles the funding called for in Title XIII of the House energy bill from $2.148 billion to $4.46 billion, starting in fiscal year 2006 through fiscal year 2010." -  EnergyWashington Week, April 27, 2005

    So these increases were included in the bill that was introduced in the House.

    Now, our Terry lurker said Terry "conceptualized" the "funding and program requirements" of the "Advanced Power System Technology Incentives Program". But that is not the name of an active program.

    This name came from a bill Terry and Doyle introduced:

    H.R.423 - To authorize the Secretary of Energy to establish an Advanced Power System Technology Incentives Program to fund the development and deployment of new advanced technologies such as advanced fuel cells, turbines, or hybrid power systems or power storage systems to generate or store electric energy, and for other purposes.

    It went no where and it is not considered to be related to any bills, let alone H.R.6 or H.R.1640, plus it wasn't focus on fuel cell research (which was considered one of several - "such as").  And what was being suggested is not new. Matter of fact, there were already research and development programs on the book.

    The Spark M. Matsunaga Hydrogen Research, Development, and Demonstration Act was passed in 1990, and has been amended and updated ever since. Matter of fact, in the final version of H.R.6, they call the Hydrogen section the "Spark M. Matsunaga Hydrogen Act of 2005".

    Where did the final wording the H.R.6 (Title VII) come from? Well...it came from S.10, which had been introduced by Sen. Pete Domenici on behalf of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Some of the wording in H.R.1640 was merged in, but the spirit and focus of the final version was primarily from the Senate version. And when it came to the funding, the specified splits were exactly the same as the Senate version:

    (h) Hydrogen Supply- There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out projects and activities relating to hydrogen production, storage, distribution and dispensing, transport, education and coordination, and technology transfer under this section--
    (1) $160,000,000 for fiscal year 2006;
    (2) $200,000,000 for fiscal year 2007;
    (3) $220,000,000 for fiscal year 2008;
    (4) $230,000,000 for fiscal year 2009;
    (5) $250,000,000 for fiscal year 2010; and
    (6) such sums as are necessary for each of fiscal years 2011 through 2020.
    (i) Fuel Cell Technologies- There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out projects and activities relating to fuel cell technologies under this section--
    (1) $150,000,000 for fiscal year 2006;
    (2) $160,000,000 for fiscal year 2007;
    (3) $170,000,000 for fiscal year 2008;
    (4) $180,000,000 for fiscal year 2009;
    (5) $200,000,000 for fiscal year 2010; and
    (6) such sums as are necessary for each of fiscal years 2011 through 2020.

    DEMONSTRATIONS
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations- There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section--
    (1) $185,000,000 for fiscal year 2006;
    (2) $200,000,000 for fiscal year 2007;
    (3) $250,000,000 for fiscal year 2008;
    (4) $300,000,000 for fiscal year 2009;
    (5) $375,000,000 for fiscal year 2010; and
    (6) such sums as are necessary for each of fiscal years 2011 through 2020.

    CODES AND STANDARDS
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations- There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section--
    (1) $4,000,000 for fiscal year 2006;
    (2) $7,000,000 for fiscal year 2007;
    (3) $8,000,000 for fiscal year 2008;
    (4) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2009;
    (5) $9,000,000 for fiscal year 2010; and
    (6) such sums as are necessary for each of fiscal years 2011 through 2020.

    The total the Senate had proposed in their version was $778 Million less than what Terry and Doyle proposed, and more specified.

    When you even examine the "Program" section of the final bill and compare it even to Terry's (H.R.423), there is nothing that could even be considered a relationship between the two.

    Finally, when the final bill was passed, there was no mention of Terry's having any involvement. Matter of fact, this is what was reported:

    "Nebraska's three House members on Thursday hailed passage of comprehensive energy legislation that includes provisions to spur ethanol development......

    Rep. Lee Terry said he expects to see more ethanol plants developed in Nebraska as a result of the bill.
    Senate enactment is expected today.

    Terry, who has worked on energy legislation for five years as a member of the House Energy Committee, said adoption of comprehensive energy legislation is critical in terms of lessening U.S. dependence on foreign oil.

    Included in the plan is development of hydrogen fuel cell technology that Terry said would make hydrogen-powered cars available by 2015." -  (Energy bill's ethanol boost pleases Nebraska delegation, Lincoln Journal Star, July 29, 2005).

    SUMMARY:

    Terry introduced a bill with Rep. Doyle,  proposing an "Advanced Power System Technology Incentives Program". The bill went no where and involved various types of energy technology. It did not focus primarily on fuel cells.

    When a hearing was held to formulate an energy policy, Terry was in attendance, but never talked or asked any questions about fuel cells. Rep. Doyle, however, asked extensive questions, and made many comments on fuel cells, including submitting a statement for the record on the issue.

    When the House Energy and Commerce Bill was marked up prior to introduction, Terry and Doyle made only one change, and that was to the funding amount. (Which, if you wanted to try and claim full "authorship" of the entire section, why would you have to make changes to your own section?). It was not related to Terry's bill he introduced previously.

    The committee bill (which Terry was a co-sponsor on as a member of the committee) was eventually folded into H.R.6, which Terry was NOT listed as a co-sponsor on. The Senate, in their work, submitted their own version of that section into the bill instead, which was making amendments to the already existing Spark M. Matsunaga Hydrogen Research, Development, and Demonstration Act.

    When the bill went to conference, some elements of the House bill were kept, but the primary framework was the Senate version. More specifically, Terry's dollar amounts were not adopted. The Senate appropriations were what were adopted.

    In short, as my husband said it when I was explaining all this, Terry tried to submit the page numbers onto a major novel, but the editor got ahold of it, provided different page numbers, and added all the chapters.

    In other words.....Terry was on the committee and voted.

    That is a far cry from "authoring" any "funding and program requirements".

    ===============================

    UPDATED II

    This is what Terry's release states at the bottom:

    It shows how misleading he is. Also, when you look at the list you see he is claiming involvement in only 2 Public Laws:  110-140, and 109-58.

    ====================================

    Tags: , , (All Tags)
    Print Friendly View Send As Email
    Bush signed the New GI Bill today.... (0.00 / 0)
    the last I heard Terry voted against it.  The GI's in Sarpy County are going to be disappointed to find out he opposed this bill.

    Record... (0.00 / 0)
    It shows he voted against it at first. But he voted for the final version.  

    [ Parent ]
    The real story though (0.00 / 0)
    Terry voted against the first version because it contained a tax increase.

    When they brought up a different version several weeks later--without the tax hike--Terry voted for it.  

    As far as serving veterans, maybe we should let groups like VFW and the Amer Legion tell us who they are endorsing in NE2?  

    Wanna take a bet on that one, ligoncl?


    [ Parent ]
    ... Terry has authored 7 major laws in just the past four years alone (0.00 / 0)
    Thank you, Lisa, for bringing this issue up.  I look forward to a clean and spirited discussion of Terry's legislative record with you.  (I'm also glad you appear to be open to non-Democrats posting on this site.  That's the way they do it on Leavenworth Street--everyone is welcome--and I just wish more of your contemporaries were open to people posting who don't parrot the company line.)

    What I have said is: "Lee Terry has authored seven major laws in the past four years alone."  I don't include bills he cosponsored or played a role in passing.  I am only counting legislative initiatives that were his idea, that he carried the water on and either sponsored at the committee or floor level.  I, again, would urge any of you who want the list to call Terry's headquarters.  They will email it or mail it to you.  The press already has it, by the way--so, if you have good relationships there, I'm sure they'll give it to you also.  

    Hill-Terry is one such law.  Everyone now agrees that this was Terry's bill.  If you don't think so, please watch the floor debate and see Chairman Dingell's comments about Terry's leadership in "the Hill-Terry bill".  (His words, not mine.)  That provision--which increased fuel economy standards by 40 percent, is probably the most important action taken in recent years to promote energy conservation.  Again, Terry's bill.  It was incorporated into the omnibus energy bill that was enacted into law in 2007 (Title 1, Section 101-136 of PL 110-140.)

    There are six other such measures, and I will go over these one-by-one with you here.  

    Congress largely enacts legislation that comes out of the committee process.  As such, bills can contain amendments or other provisions offered by individual members.  That is what Terry has done.  Again, 7 major laws since 2005.

    If you care to argue this around and around, let's go!

    In the meantime, please answer one simple question:  why does Jim Esch not believe it is important to follow the rules?  I'm referring to the fact that his 2007 financial disclosure form still has not been filed with the U.S. House even though is was due on May 15.  Why hasn't he complied with the law?  What is he hiding?  


    Your pretty technologically savvy.. (0.00 / 0)
    Put it on leeterry.com

    Why should we have to call your office. Put it on your site!


    [ Parent ]
    It's on Leavenworth (0.00 / 0)
    You can get it there.

    http://leavenworthstreet.blogs...

    An outstanding web site about the latest in Nebraska politics.  Plus, anyone can post--you don't have to all agree with each other as seems to be a requirement at nnn.


    [ Parent ]
    Wait a minute... (0.00 / 0)
    I seem to recall... Ah, yes:
    "I'm also glad you appear to be open to non-Democrats posting on this site ... everyone is welcome."  Your words, not mine.  Nor have I seen any evidence of anyone preventing you from posting or forcing you to "parrot the company line."  Seems to be another unsubstantiated claim that you're so good at making.

    [ Parent ]
    Avoiding...... (4.00 / 1)
    When you say "Authored", that, in political terms, means "Sponsored".

    Quit pussyfooting around: List the bills by bill number and session, and what you claim Terry "authored". Because the official site for the Legislative Branch of the US Government shows only what I listed for you.

    This should be easy. It's a list you should already have. Copy/Paste and present for review........


    [ Parent ]
    Lisa--Thomas doesn't show amendment sponsors at the committee level (0.00 / 0)
    With all due respect, do you know how Congress operates?  Sounds like you don't.  Most legislation originates in committee--they report out bills that contain numerous provisions that were added at that point.  Then, they go to the floor of the House or Senate for further amendment.  That's what Tery has done.  He has authored provisions that were included in legislation that went on to become law.  Thomas doesn't reflect that since they don't show the originator or sponsor of amendments.  

    The fact is, Terry has authored seven major laws in just the past four years alone!  Facts don't lie. I already gave you Hill-Terry.  Here's another:  requiring that the federal government's vehicle fleet fuel stations offer E85.  That was Terry's idea, he drew up the proposal, he offered it and got it approved by the committee in omnibus legislation that passed.  See PL 110-140, section 141.  

    I see you ignored my question.  Let me rephrase it.  Jim appears to think that rules don't matter.  That, while candidates are required to file financial disclosure forms by May 15, for some reason he doesn't have to.  What is he hiding?  I suspect the form will show that this is a 32-year old guy who essentially lives off of trust fund payments from his mom and dad.  Is that the case?  

     


    [ Parent ]
    PG blowing smoke again (0.00 / 0)
    Terry is a Congressional powerhouse because of his secret committee work?  You really are having trouble making a silk purse out of a sow's ear.  Any slacker in Congress can claim to be great based on "secret" work.  More instructive is the way Congressmen are ranked by their peers and by objective observers.  These groups all agree that Lee Terry is one of the weakest representatives in the whole body.  I guess the pros were fooled by his "secret" work, too?

    Even more laughable is a Republican who tries to smear people with trust funds.  If they eliminated trust fund babies, the whole Republican establishment would virtually disappear overnight.  What do you do in your real life, lobby against the "death tax"?


    [ Parent ]
    Um.... (0.00 / 0)
    Actually, I know exactly how Congress works, and it appears far more than you. You see, while bills do go through committees, and some are actually created within committees with all the members involved, a LOT of bills (the majority, actually) start out as something A REPRESENTATIVE introduces, and THEN it goes to committees for hearings. And with those hearings are transcripts, and Committee Reports that show who submitted what amendents and changes, and if necessary, who voted how on each amendment and the final approval of the bill. Most Representatives will be a "cosponsor" on the bill then, and note just leave their name off.

    Terry has yet to have a bill HE has "Authored" (the term you us, which means SPONSOR) go from INTRODUCTION to VOTE, and that has a real, significant and direct impact on all the constituents of his District. Renaming a post office? Give me a break!

    And still you have YET to present these great and powerful 7 Laws that Terry has "authored". You obviously don't understand what it is your are insinuating. Or maybe you do and, as with most Republicans, you have no problem lying to make yourself and your boy look good.

    What you are really saying now is that Terry cannot take the lead on anything. Not once. That HILL-Terry bill? It was Hill that took the lead. Terry (as the OWH stated it) "helped". But that is one thing in 10 years, and someone else had to pull him along. If he hadn't been there, someone else would have been able to easily do the work instead of him. He was not special in that regard.

    What has Terry done, on his own, as the LEADER? What are these so-called 7 Laws?

    The fact you keep avoiding that question on a thread about Terry, and instead keep obsessing with Jim Esch (which you can do on other threads, thank you) indicates you have no faith in your answer.

    The longer you avoid, the more it is clear that you have no real answer.  


    [ Parent ]
    PoliticalGuy (0.00 / 0)
    It must be exhausting to be you.  Having to try to defend Terry's non-record and try to pretend that Congress works a different way than it actually does must be worth tons of money.

    [ Parent ]
    Lisa I am affraid that PoliticalGuy is correct... (0.00 / 0)
    Lisa, I am a current legislative staffer on capitol hill and deal with this legislative sausage factory on a daily basis and after reading your post and comparing it to what PoliticalGuy posted it sounds like PoliticalGuy is correct.  "Authored" does not necessarily mean sponsor (or at least sponsor according to Thomas).

    What happens is that many different proposals are offered by many different members on one larger issue.  Usually as stand alone bills on only one piece of a larger bill.  These stand alone bills rarely pass on their own, regardless of the member's seniority or party.  

    They are, however referred to committee.  During this committee process these stand alone bills are usually packaged together to become part of one larger bill usually offered for consideration on the House floor under the name of the chairman of referring committee.  This means that there are many "Authors" for legislation that reaches the House floor.  Not just the Sponsor that is listed by Thomas.

    I deal with this everyday and this is how it works.  I hope I have explained it in a way that makes sense.


    [ Parent ]
    I am aware of that.... (0.00 / 0)
    .....but if you're new to here you don't know what he's been saying. He's claiming leadership that just isn't there.

    Matter of fact, if you go back and read what I wrote, I followed all of Terry's original work (that HE INTRODUCED, not someone else), and you see the result. One post office, one amendment. That's it. He has not take the lead on any major legislation and has not been the one that can claim ownership of "authoring 7 major laws".

    Now....where is that list?  


    [ Parent ]
    But read your own post again, Lisa (0.00 / 0)
    Lisa--Terry sponsored or authored the 7 provisions I reference.  They then went on to be included in legislation that was enacted into law.  

    It is very simple.  Why can't you follow that?  


    [ Parent ]
    Referencing vs. Handing Over (0.00 / 0)
    Anyone can "reference" a list of accomplishments.  How about handing it over.  If you think this list of 7 bills is so conclusive, then don't just wave your list around, give us the numbers on all of the bills and where it's shown that Terry sponsored or authored them.  Just because you say Terry sponsored or authored 7 bills over and over again doesn't make it true.

    [ Parent ]
    PG + CS = scam (0.00 / 0)
    Hmmm, why does "congressionalstaffer" smell like a scam?

    First, he has to be a Republican trolling a partisan message, because their are only Rs in Congress in this state.  Second, everything he says is unverifiable, a message totally on faith.  List of bills?  Nothing.  Comment on Lee Terry's abysmal ratings?  Nothing.  Facts of any kind?  Zero.

    Just the bland assertion that CS knows better than others, based on his unverified claim that he is an anonymouse insider, and we sincerely should take him at his -- Republican -- word.

    Why in the world would anyone give this type of garbage more than a passing and extremely skeptical glance?  In real life he and PG are room-mates.  PG lobbies against inheritance taxes, and CG tries to get it passed.  In their spare time they write partisan diatribes devoid of facts to try to hoodwink ordinary citizens.


    [ Parent ]
    "Congressional staffer" (0.00 / 0)
    I've been a congressional staffer myself.  Come on.  What Political Guy has said is, "Terry has authored seven major laws in just the past four years alone!"  You know as well as anyone that that is a complete crock.  Give me a break!  Just because you have voted "yay" or "nay" on someone else's bill in committee does NOT mean that you have authored any laws!

    [ Parent ]
    Here's the third law Lee Terry authored! (0.00 / 0)
    Hi Lisa--hope you're doing well.  I did tell you I would go over the list one by one, and I will keep my word on that.  I've already given you two of the laws that Lee Terry authored in just the past four years alone.  Hill-Terry and the E85 fueling station law.  

    #3--research and development for fuel cells.  This is under the Advanced Power system Technology Incentives Program.  The funding and program requirements were Terry's idea; he conceptualized it, he offered the proposal in committee and it was adopted.  The full bill then went on to pass--with this Terry law as part of it (Public Law 109-58, Title VII).

    Any questions?

    Be assured I have voluminous backup on each and every one of Terry's seven laws.  Want to see it?  Come on over to the HQ.    You're welcome any time.  

    Noticed you refuse to defend Esch.  I don't blame you.

    Question:  how do you defend the fact that Jim still hasn't complied with the law as set forth by the FEC?  They told him to amend his April Quarter report by 6/13--he hasn't done so yet.  Why?    



    [ Parent ]
    Actually.... (0.00 / 0)
    You've only suggested 1, and this is the 2nd. What is the "E85" law?

    So how much is Terry paying you to troll on websites all day, anyway? You are one of his campaign staff.  


    [ Parent ]
    Three laws that Terry authored! (0.00 / 0)
    Lisa--go back to the top of the thread and read down.  I gave you #1: Hill-Terry (PL 110-140, Title 1, section 101-136),#2, E85 (PL 110-140, section 141) and #3 Advanced Power system Technology Program (PL 109-58, Title VII).  Four more coming.  

    I'm giving you the information as I promised.  

    I suspect you troll frequently (along with Sund and others) on Leavenworth.  The only difference between you and me is you do it anonymously there.  

    It only takes a moment to come on here, see your absurd posts, whack out a quick response and then go back to work.  

    I heard the Esch campaign finally just got the voter file from Douglas County. Wow--very impressive.  Are they going to start contacting voters by Labor Day?  


    [ Parent ]
    Anonymous? (0.00 / 0)
    If you're not being anonymous right now, PG, the I truly feel sorry for you.  I'm sure the kids in school gave you a rough time.  So, do you go by the full "PoliticalGuy" or do you abbreviate it to "PG"?  What a load of crock.

    [ Parent ]
    Of course, Adrian Smith hasn't had 10 years, (0.00 / 0)
    but I saw him on CSpan suggesting such and such day be proclaimed National Future Farmer's of America Day.  These guy, Terry and Smith, are weighty, for sure.

    What about Fortenberry? (0.00 / 0)
    You mention Smith and Terry, but what about Fortenberry?  I think he's the most worthless of the entire Congressional Delegation.  He entirely concentrates on these "Feel Good Issues", without offering any substance.  This guy's a tool - What has he actually done other than constantly being a douchbag to everyone he meets?

    [ Parent ]
    Political Guy... (0.00 / 0)
    Well, then post all of these so-called provisions that our esteemed, respected and powerful Congressman has gotten passed.  

    [ Parent ]
    IT IS POSTED ON LEVEANWORTH STREET (0.00 / 0)
    Amazing!  

    Leavenworth Street scoops NNN agaIn!


    [ Parent ]
    A challenge to the NE media (0.00 / 0)
    The Terrybots repeatedly claim "the media has it" when rferring to this mythical list of seven major bills.

    My challenge to the NE media - and most of you do read this blog - check out the list, compare it to what Lisa has shown here and print the truth.

    Or if you can't figure it out - send the list to NNN anonymously and let Lisa do it for your lazy butt.

    But don't, please don't repeat in your reporting this nonsense that Lee has done anything of significance. At least don't do it without checking the facts.

    The great irony here is that in the 2006 election, Lee was among the Republicans attaking Ben Nelson for having authored and passed "only" 7 bills in his first term. Now Lee is acting like his make beleive 7 is some sort of accomplishment. The media went with the Republican talking points in 06. Let's see if they have a backbone and an internet connection for research this cycle.

    And as I said, if you don't have the stomach - and that means all of you reading this now - let Lisa do it for you.


    I would be fair... (0.00 / 0)
    ...I believe in it. But if I don't have this list of supposed accomplishments, there is nothing go off of. Just Thomas.

    And I looked at some of the sites that still use one of the House templates for their websites (not the fancy ones people like Smith and Terry pay extra for). Just like I remembered: links to bills "authored" and "co-authored".

    Just like the amendment, if it's clear Terry put something in, even as a cosponsor, and it went through to being signed by the President, I'll be able to track that.



    [ Parent ]
    Reagan was right! (0.00 / 0)
    Lisa--I suspect you would be fair about it.

    But I'm like Reagan: trust but verify.  

    To be safe, the Fact Sheet is available for all to see on Leavenworth Street.  Go for it!


    [ Parent ]
    ...or call Terry's HQ for it! (0.00 / 0)
    Just wanted to add that Bruin has a good point, for once.  

    The news media does have the Fact Sheet on the seven major laws that Terry has authored--over just the past four years alone.  

    We gave that to the media.  We hope one or more of them can give it to Lisa--so she can post it here!

    Or, feel free to call Terry's HQ and ask for the list.  

    Or, please keep reading the thread. Either way is fine. I've already gone over 3 of the Terry laws, and will continue to go through them one-by-one.  

    Question:  I don't think Esch has issued any kind of position paper since he was caught red-handed by the media in May plagiarizing the Brookings Institution report on subprime mortgages.  Still gunshy, Jim?  

     


    [ Parent ]
    News ... News .... News!!!!!! (0.00 / 0)
    June 26, 2008 Contact:  Dave Boomer
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE              

    Rep. Lee Terry:  significant legislative achievements

    The Terry for Congress campaign today released documentation that shows the congressman has authored seven major public laws in the past four years.  

    "We are showing today that Congressman Terry is a prolific writer of important laws," said David Boomer, Terry's campaign manager.  "The fact is the congressman has authored seven important laws since 2005.  These are the kinds of changes our country needs."

    The Terry record on lawmaking includes lead sponsorship of the landmark "Hill-Terry" fuel economy bill, as well as public laws that relate to research and development on fuel cells and an increased use of ethanol in the federal government's vehicle fleet.  Other Terry laws provide for more energy efficient federal buildings and homes, protections for renewable fuels and new standards over liquid natural gas terminals.

    "Each of the items we are citing today involve public laws that Lee Terry is responsible for enacting.  These were his ideas, he conceptualized them, and the congressman worked them through the legislative process to final passage," Boomer said.  

    In an interview with the Omaha World-Herald on June 19, 2008 , candidate Jim Esch is referenced as saying, "Terry has passed only one bill" over the course of his congressional career.  

    "The fact is Lee Terry wrote seven major laws over the past four years and is working on bipartisan legislation to make America energy independent.  Mr. Esch should spend more time studying the facts and complying with the law-he has yet to file an overdue financial disclosure form with the U.S. House-and less time on false negative attacks," Boomer said.  

    Congressman Terry has vowed to work toward passage of his comprehensive energy proposal in the next session of Congress. Taken together, Terry's ideas would enable the United States to displace all foreign oil by producing more energy domestically over the next ten years.
                            30


    Blah, blah, blah..... (0.00 / 0)
    Spin and more spin from a political hack.

    Believe me the "drama" you think you're creating is far from it. It's just continueing to refuse to provide a full list once and for all. Doesn't Terry give you enough work to fill your day?  


    [ Parent ]
    By the way..... (0.00 / 0)
    I don't know of anyone who has every put whole so-called "press releases" on Leavenworth Street that are from Democratic Candidates.

    Talk about bad taste on your part.  


    [ Parent ]
    Political Guy... (0.00 / 0)
    come on.  That press release is so transparent.

    You said, "released documentation that shows the congressman has authored seven major public laws in the past four years."

    Give us P.L. numbers please.  
     


    [ Parent ]
    Watch it more closely, watchingitall! (0.00 / 0)
    That's what I've been doing.  

    You want citations--I gave you three so far.  PL numbers and even sections/titles.

    I am going through Terry's laws one by one.

    All I've asked in exchange is for Lisa or someone to answer a question or two about Esch.

    Your silence is deafening.  

    BTW--the press got the Fact Sheet on 6/26 along with the release.  


    [ Parent ]
    Then send your releases to LS... (0.00 / 0)
    If you have something newsy to say, I bet they'd post them.  

    You asked me to cut and paste the material right into the thread.  I did that with the news release and now you get mad.  I can't win here, can I?


    [ Parent ]
    Press release vs List (0.00 / 0)
    Do we need to explain the difference to you? I guess you continue to be afraid your whole "list" or (*cough*) "fact" sheet on here. Sad......

    [ Parent ]
    Terry's record (0.00 / 0)
    If Terry is such a prolific bill writer.  Why don't you just provide us with the bill numbers, amendments so we can track them on Thomas?

    [ Parent ]
    This is interesting (0.00 / 0)
    I find this pretty interesting, but can someone explain the fuel cell law with just the facts and no spin?

    SEE UPDATE IN MAIN ARTICLE (0.00 / 0)
    I debunked the "Fuel Cell" claim. When I have time, I'll work on the others, but if they are like this one, Terry is continuing to claim "authoring" of other people's work. Imagine that!!

    And I'm surprised Terry pay's his staffers to hang around NNN all day......talk about wasting money!


    Lisa, you rock! (0.00 / 0)
    Oh my gosh!  That's so funny!  Thank you for your very informative update!  Terry is such a doofus.

    [ Parent ]
    Lisa--you've made the case....for Terry! Thank you! (0.00 / 0)
    Your "research" shows: 1) Terry offered the amendment that set funding levels for fuel cells; 2) Terry's amendment passed, and 3) became part of the overall bill which then passed.

    That means Terry authored the law--in this case, fuel cells.  
    Thank you!  

    I think we need to show an in-kind contribution from you on this!  Thanks.


    [ Parent ]
    You obviously didn't read her analysis (0.00 / 0)
    And anyone with any sense would easily look at the situation and realize what should be blatantly obvious by now:  Lee Terry has done absolutely nothing of merit during his decade in Congress, short of showing up and voting.  The 2nd District, and Nebraska, deserve far better than that.

    [ Parent ]
    OK Pot... (0.00 / 0)
    Lisa - I'm not advocating FOR Terry, but don't pretend that you are 'above' spin or twisting the facts to fit your side - I've certainly seen this done by you time and time again over at the SmithWatch.
    Aren't you paid by the DNC to be a tracker?  I'm sorry, but in my mind that is no better.

    Also, don't jump on the Terry staffers for posting on your turf - Doesn't the DNC find enough to keep you busy as well?


    [ Parent ]
    I'm not paid by the DNC (0.00 / 0)
    And if you find something (backed with supporting sources) that is not supporting the conclusion I made (which I did back with supporting sources), please present it. Thank you.

    [ Parent ]
    But you are a PAID tracker. What's the dif? (0.00 / 0)
    Oh Please?  Don't give me this.  You're so brave to point out the number of bills that both Terry and Smith pass each year, that I've got to ask - What's that 'MAGIC' number that you are looking for, that would show an effective Congressman?  Have you ever looked to see how many bills DEMOCRATIC Congressman have introduced/passed? - Our Congressman are inline with everyone else.

    The job of Congressman is a serious one, one that does not focus merely on how many bills can someone introduce in a year?  I for one believe that the number of bills passed each session of Congress is WAY too many as is.  Did you ever stop and think that many the job of Congressman can be to help 'influence' or work "behind-the-scenes" to create a favorable outcome for the people in their district?  Working with constituents to help them navigate through the complexities of the federal government in their time of need?  The simple fact that you don't recognize that the job is larger than "Who can pass the more number of bills" shows your bias and narrow thinking view of Congress.


    [ Parent ]
    Bill are an indicator (0.00 / 0)
    There is more work than just authoring legislation.  However, we should not assume he is busting his ass in those areas either.  Terry is lazy.  He has become that way because he has never been challenged in the primaries.  Do you really think the district would lose anything if Terry was gone?

    [ Parent ]
    As lazy as... (0.00 / 0)
    Someone who can't file his FEC Reports?
    All I'm saying is that I think you guys are arguing the wrong point, and for the wrong person.
    I like Mr. Esch, he seems sincere - but If you're arguing that Esch will be any better given HIS track record of late reports and doing the typical college student thing of waiting until the night a paper is due and copy/pasting from another source, you need to rethink that.  Laziness abounds - I agree with one of the earlier statments that Mr. Carter would have been a much better flag bear for the Democratic party.

    [ Parent ]
    Lisa's 'standard' is absurd (0.00 / 0)
    Here's what she is saying:  nothing counts unless it is a bill that the member was the original sponsor of.  That's ludicrous.  No one believes that.  

    Lisa--since you have so much time on your hand to blog, why don't you blog Esch and tell him to file his financial disclosure form with the House.  It is now 48 days overdue.  

    What's he hiding?


    [ Parent ]
    Political Guy, you know what no one believes? (0.00 / 0)
    That Lee Terry is the "author of major laws" when he only contributed some minor provisions to major laws that others developed.  Especially when it's questionable which of his provisions were actually adopted.

    [ Parent ]
    get a grip (0.00 / 0)
    First of all, isn't it the terry campaign that is hanging its hat on their fake seven laws? I seem to recall that one of you trolls started the argument.

    Lisa has kicked your butts on your sily claims. take your medicine and please continue with the last 4 fake laws. By the time you're done you'll have blown the election.

    as far as congress being serious business here's how Lee represents Omaha:

    he sleeps in his office on an air mattress
    he hurls insults at Democrats on the floor and when confronted he backs down like a sissy (see Jesse Jackson, Jr.)
    he bashes on the congressional payraise, but takes it anyway
    he was for earmarks until he decided to attack democrats, then he was against them until the Omaha star chamber told him to wise up.
    He sounds like foghornleghorn and looks like the robot from Lost in Space.
    He's a partisan robot who has accomplishednothing but a colon inspection of the Republcian leadership

    Yes, Congress is serious business. Isn't it time we had a serious congressman?


    [ Parent ]
    But you are paid by the NDP, right? (0.00 / 0)
    http://query.nictusa.com/cal-bin
    fecing?C00003988

    Payment to Lisa Hannah, $2,000 5/19/08  Research Consultant

    Payment to Lisa Hannah, $232.80 5/19/08  mileage

    Interesting you tried to hide that from the last poster.


    [ Parent ]
    Hide? Seriously? (0.00 / 0)
    They asked if I worked for the DNC. I don't.

    And what I do on my paid time has nothing to do with this. This is my personal time, and my hobby - holding politicians accountable. Bringing this up is just a little tactic by you to avoid facing the fact your a lying to voters.

    So....want to get back on topic? Didn't think so. It's too painful for you.


    [ Parent ]
    At least... (0.00 / 0)
    Lisa uses her real name. That's why you were able to find that information. If she went by...oh say.. PoliticalGal, you wouldn't have been able to look that up unless you knew who she was.

    We have no way of knowing who you are due to your use of a pseudonym. We can't look up your background or any information. I may use only my first name and last initial instead of a whole name, but at least I list an email address for myself. You don't even have an email listed in your profile! I don't want to throw the not playing fair/not playing well with others card, but seriously. You're calling out other people and looking up information about them, but you haven't given us the same information about yourself!


    [ Parent ]
    You debunked nothing (0.00 / 0)
    Your research proves what I said: Terry offered the provision on fuel cells that became law.  It did.  

    Why don't you research Hill-Terry a little bit more.  Read Dingell's comments on the House floor.  

    Why the silence on Esch?  You won't defend your guy?  

    Interesting that all you offer is attacks on Terry--nothing positive on Esch.  That's a losing strategy for a loser candidate.


    [ Parent ]
    Caeser (0.00 / 0)
    So the guy that wrote a class paper on Julius Caeser back in the fourth grade gets to claim credit for having written The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire? PG, you suck at logic.

    [ Parent ]
    I've got it! (0.00 / 0)
    Let's have a contest to see how many bills each Member of Congress can write and propose in a week - that's bound to produce results and not prove to be a giant nightmare of regulation for everyone?  Would that qualify everyone as an 'effective' MoC?

    [ Parent ]
    PG.... (0.00 / 0)
    so if Dingell is so in love with Lee Terry, when is he coming to Omaha to campaign for him?

    [ Parent ]
    Why don't you give Dingell a jingle and ask? (0.00 / 0)
    If he can't appear for Terry, maybe we could use the footage of his comments-- "...these two members, from Indiana and Nebraska, have provided extraordinary leadership in this matter, in the Hill-Terry bill, and they deserve the great thanks and congratulations of this Congress..."  in a nice TV ad...  


    [ Parent ]
    ANOTHER UPDATE (0.00 / 0)
    Update III on the E85 claim is now posted.  

    Moved..... (0.00 / 0)
    To a new article. You can post your comments on it there.  

    [ Parent ]
    House Resolution 8765: Ban ALL Business With The State of Nebraska (0.00 / 0)
    The Republicans boasted publicly they made a great beef deal with the South Koreans.

    I personally went on a campaign afterward to have all business with Nebraska, particularly in Asia, denounced as doing business with a sadistic criminal entity which promotes the rape of its residents.

    The Korean deal has fallen through.

    Greater Omaha Packing or one of the other packing plants in Omaha has now sold E-Coli tainted beef to other states in America and a massive recall is underway.

    As I tighten the thumbscrews of the feds to squeeze the life blood out of Nebraska, I ask you, "will your banning my posts on your pathetic little political blog prevent the truth from reaching the rest of the world about the serial rapist you, as Nebraskans, sent to Congress?"

    No, it's not the goosestepping, gutless, Lee Terry. It's the vile unregistered sex offender Hal Daub.

    I will squeeze ever drop of life support out of the state of Nebraska until a legitimate investigation into the violent sexual assault on my mother and the torture and poisoning of myself is finally conducted by the Omaha Police Division.

    Get ready for welfare, Republicans.

    You pieces of garbage.

    The boycott of all Nebraska products has been underway since Feb. 01, 2008. The rapes Daub is accused of committing along with his heroin trafficking to 7 years olds in Omaha took place in 1972.

    Justice is long overdo.

    How is your precious reputation now, Nebraska???

    Google "Boycott Nebraska" and visit USENET (newsgroups) for posts with the same name at nebr.gov, alt.vietnam.veterans, alt.net.nazis.must.die, and a hundred more.

    Make certain you view the attached JPG files with the USENET posts. A high speed Internet connection is recommended.

    Find out who else is aware of John McCain's Nebraska campaign manager's actions (Hal Daub).

    "I got the last laugh on you, and I'm singing the outlaw blues!!!"


    You are crazy as hell . . . (4.00 / 1)
    but you seem to really believe this stuff.  Despite the fact that you can't provide evidence for any of your accusations, I'm going to hold off from deleting the latest of your libelous comments.  If nothing else it probably qualifies for free speech protections as a work of satire.

    Still, this is a one time exception.  You've made your plea and your accusation, while leaving your trail of online bread crumbs to further works of anti-Hal Daub insanity.  Now, please find another site to bother.  Have you ever heard of Leavenworth Street?  


    [ Parent ]
    New Nebraska Network
    Not Just Red to Blue - More than One Label for Another


    Active Users
    Currently 3 user(s) logged on.

    Menu

    Make a New Account

    Username:

    Password:



    Forget your username or password?


    NNN on Twitter

    101st Legislature

    Progressive Partners
  • Coalition For Lifesaving Cures
  • Nebraskans For Obama
  • Change That Works - Nebraska
  • Nebraska Democratic Party
  • Nebraska Young Democrats
  • Nebraskans for Peace
  • Center for Rural Affairs
  • Nebraska Appleseed Center
  • Center for People in Need
  • ACLU Nebraska
  • Sierra Club Nebraska
  • Common Cause Nebraska
  • Voices For Children
  • Opportunity@Work
  • Power Up Nebraska

  • Politicians & Candidates
  • Tom White for Congress (D-02)
  • Mark Lakers for Governor (D)
  • Mark Stoj for Treasurer (D)
  • Janet Stewart for Sec/State (D)
  • Rebekah Davis for Cong. (D-03)
  • Lee Terry for Congress (R-02)
  • Dave Heineman for Governor (R)
  • Tom Nesbitt for Treasurer (R)
  • Tony Fulton for Treasurer (R)
  • Don Stenberg for Treasurer (R)
  • John Gale for Sec/State (R)
  • Adrian Smith for Congress (R-03)
  • Bruning for Atty Gen (R)
  • Sen. Ben Nelson (D)
  • Sen. Mike Johanns (R)
  • Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-01)
  • Rep. Lee Terry (R-02)
  • Rep. Adrian Smith (R-03)
  • Governor's Office
  • Atty General's Office
  • Sec. of State's Office
  • Unicameral Directory
  • Mayor Jim Suttle (D, Omaha)
  • Mayor Chris Beutler (D, Lincoln)
  • Nebraska Democratic Party
  • Nebraska Green Party
  • Nebraska Republican Party

  • Local Media
  • Nebraska State Paper
  • Prairie Fire
  • The Reader
  • North Platte Bulletin
  • Sandhills Express
  • Southwest Nebraska News
  • NET Nebraska Public Radio
  • KFAB Talk Radio (Omaha)
  • KLIN Talk Radio (Lincoln)
  • Channel 3 - CBS (Omaha)
  • Channel 4 - ABC (Kearney)
  • Channel 5 - NBC (Hastings)
  • Channel 6 - NBC (Omaha)
  • Channel 7 - ABC (Omaha)
  • Channel 8 - ABC (Lincoln)
  • Channel 10 - CBS (Lincoln)
  • Channel 42 - Fox (Omaha)

  • Submit a Letter to the Editor
  • Omaha World-Herald
  • Lincoln Journal-Star
  • Daily Nebraskan (UNL)
  • Grand Island Independent
  • Kearney Hub
  • North Platte Telegraph
  • Norfolk Daily News
  • Fremont Tribune
  • Columbus Telegram
  • McCook Daily Gazette
  • Scottsbluff Star-Herald
  • Hastings Tribune

  • Powered by: SoapBlox