About NNN
Since March 2005, New Nebraska Network has been Nebraska's online voice for progressive political change. Thank you for being part of the NNN community!

Managing Editor:
Kyle Michaelis,
kyle@newnebraska.net

NNN is a meritocracy. Contribute and you will be rewarded.


Join the Network

Subscribe: RSS Front

Subscribe: RSS Diaries

Subscribe: By E-mail

NNN on Facebook

NNN on Twitter

Read NNN Archives
(pre-August 2007)

Poll
How does Jon Bruning come back from losing election based on ethics and character issues?
He doesn't. He's done.
Don't know but got plenty of $$$ to keep spirit up
May be done climbing but AG as long as he wants it
Not a problem. Will declare for Governor 2014 soon

Results

Search




Advanced Search


Local Blog Roll
  • Running Chicken
  • Flag On The Play
  • Progressive Oasis
  • Bold Nebraska - News
  • Aksarbent
  • NE Appleseed Blog
  • Blog for Rural America
  • Neal Obermeyer 'Toons
  • Paul Fell Cartoons
  • Bill Dunn Cartoons
  • The State Line (OWH)
  • The Hall (OWH)
  • Nebraska Watchdog
  • NE Greensprouts
  • Revolution-21
  • Leavenworth Street
  • Objective Conservative
  • Grassroots In NE
  • Winterized
  • Harold W. Andersen
  • Red State Report
  • Right-Wing Professor
  • Omaha Liberal Examiner
  • Today On The Lege
  • BJ Nebraska
  • Lincolnite
  • Rise of the Center
  • Mark Fahleson
  • Red State Eclectic
  • Heartland Notebook
  • Conservative Examiner
  • Republican Examiner
  • Nebraska Outback
  • Economic Trends
  • Art Diamond Blog
  • Vital Signs
  • Domestic Divapalooza
  • Omaha TV News

  • 50 State Blog Network
  • Alabama
  • Arizona
  • California
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • DailyKos
  • Firedoglake
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Idaho
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Iowa
  • Louisiana
  • Maine
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • Missouri
  • Montana
  • MyDD
  • Nebraska
  • Nevada
  • New Hampshire
  • New Jersey
  • New Mexico
  • New York (a)
  • New York (b)
  • North Carolina
  • North Dakota
  • Ohio (a)
  • Ohio (b)
  • Oklahoma
  • Open Left
  • Oregon
  • Pennsylvania
  • Rhode Island
  • Swing State Project
  • Tennessee
  • Texas (a)
  • Texas (b)
  • Utah
  • Vermont
  • Virginia
  • Washington
  • West Virginia
  • Wisconsin

  • Has Shane Osborn Proven That Nebraska Doesn't Need A State Treasurer?

    by: Kyle Michaelis

    Wed Mar 10, 2010 at 22:10:22 PM CST


    Legislative Resolution 284CA - introduced and prioritized by State Senator Dennis Utter of Hastings - would put a constitutional amendment on the November 2010 ballot to abolish the office of State Treasurer.  This makes for an intriguing political dynamic because State Treasurer is the only statewide constitutional office that's open in this year's election after incumbent Republican Shane Osborn announced last summer that he wouldn't seek a 2nd term.

    On Tuesday's first round vote by the Legislature, LR 284CA received support from 37 State Senators - well more than the 30 needed to put the question to the voters.  Registering as "present but not voting" was State Senator Tony Fulton of Lincoln, one of three candidates running for the Republican nomination for the office.  He'll face former Attorney General Don Stenberg and former State Patrol commander Tom Nesbitt in the May primary, with the winner of that contest likely to face Democrat Mark Stoj in November.  If support holds for the resolution in the Legislature, voters will not only be choosing their next State Treasurer in that election but will also be deciding whether he will be their last.  

    The one conosolation for these candidates is that the winner should at least be assured a full term in office.  As originally introduced, the proposed amendment would have taken effect on January 1, 2013. That has since been amended so the State Treasurer would remain in existence until January 8, 2015.  

    Still, the question remains why Nebraska should abolish this office.  From Utter's statements and those of other supporters of the resolution, it primarily has to do with efficiency and cost-savings.  There's also been talk that eliminating State Treasurer would result in even more consolidation of power in the hands of the Governor.  This could also mean more accountability resting with the Governor, with less opportunity for shifting blame - at least, in theory.

    According to the Omaha World-Herald, three attempts were made to eliminate the State Treasurer's office in the 1990s.  However, it wasn't until now that the proposal has had any real chance at passing. So far, there's been no public discussion of Shane Osborn's record as Treasurer having anything to do with the growing support for eliminating his position.  But, just because it hasn't been said doesn't mean that it's not a factor with State Senators and that it won't be one with voters.

    Osborn never made any attempt to hide that he perceived this office as a political stepping stone, hoping to follow the lead of former State Treasurers Dave Heineman and Kay Orr, who both went on to serve as Governor.  However, while Osborn's term has not been so disastrous as that of Heineman-protege Lorelee Byrd, it's certainly raised enough questions about his dedication, leadership, and decision-making to hurt his political future - and to even make some people question whether Nebraska really needs a State Treasurer at all.

    Following are the top three ways in which Shane Osborn has hurt the standing and jeopardized the future of the office he currently holds:

    Kyle Michaelis :: Has Shane Osborn Proven That Nebraska Doesn't Need A State Treasurer?
    1.  Evidently, It's Not A Full-Time Job

    In June of 2007, the Omaha World-Herald reported:

    State Treasurer Shane Osborn has continued working for an Omaha insurance brokerage while holding his $85,000-a-year elected office.  Osborn confirmed Tuesday that he remains director of the aviation risk division for SilverStone Group, the company where he worked after leaving the Navy and while running for state treasurer last year.

    A Republican, Osborn took office in January.  He said the SilverStone work is part time and carried out during his off hours. He said it does not conflict with his duties as state treasurer....But some elected officials and a government watchdog questioned whether Nebraska voters want their constitutional officers holding second jobs.

    "This idea that you can be a full-time public servant and a part-time employee somewhere else, that's not what the public expected," said Jack Gould, a spokesman for Common Cause Nebraska.

    Secretary of State John Gale said he thinks people expect top constitutional officers - governor, lieutenant governor, auditor, secretary of state, attorney general and treasurer - to be full time, especially at their level of pay.


    Outrage at Osborn's moonlighting was so strong that, in 2008, State Senator Bill Avery of Lincoln went so far as introducing a bill that would have prohibited outside employment for Nebraska's executive officers.  That bill never ended up going anywhere, but the fact that Osborn could get away with holding down a second job while serving as State Treasurer certainly left the impression that it must not be that important of a job to begin with.  If Osborn wasn't going to take the position seriously, why should State Senators or Nebraska voters?

    2. Mismanagement and Illegal Practices

    In September of 2008, the Associated Press reported:

    A former employee in the Nebraska Treasurer's Office has sued the state, alleging he was directed to illegally create a computer program to prohibit employees from filing for overtime.

    Robert Harrison of Lincoln alleges that after he refused - including directing his protests toward State Treasurer Shane Osborn and several managers - his bosses retaliated by asking him to resign....Harrison alleges the retaliation violates labor laws. He is seeking to be returned to his database and Web development position, for which the state hired him in December 2007, or to be paid what he would have earned. The lawsuit also asks for unspecified compensatory damages.

    "He was only looking out for the interest of his employees of the State Treasurer's Office," [Attorney Kathleen] Neary said. "He refused to do something that was illegal"....

    It's unfortunate the lawsuit was filed, Osborn said. "I'm fully confident once the facts are revealed the Treasurer's Office will be fully exonerated."


    Osborn thought his office would be exonerated then.  According to the Associated Press fifteen months later, he still believes that to this day.  But, this lawsuit is still working its way through the civil justice system, and the facts that have been reported suggest that, ultimately, the state is going to have to pay.  When it does, Osborn probably won't be in office, but he will be to blame.

    3. A Broken Trust

    In April of 2009, a Lincoln Journal-Star editorial noted:

    It is disappointing to see that our beloved state of Nebraska has the dubious distinction of being the only state with two 529 college-savings plans in Morningstar's list of the worst performers....Last fall, Nebraska's responsible parties handed management of one of its 529 funds to Oppenheimer Funds Inc., which Morningstar, the respected research company, calls "the poster child for how badly some 529 players went awry in 2008."  

    At the time, Nebraska state Treasurer Shane Osborn took credit publicly for aggressively pursuing an Oppenheimer Funds subsidiary to become the new investment manager of Nebraska's State Farm College Savings Plan, one of the state's four options. It looked as if the choice would save some costs for the college-saving clientele.

    But the change was made just in time for the implosion...of the Oppenheimer Core Bond fund, a fixture in Oppenheimer-managed 529s that lost more than 35 percent in 2008, mostly because of management's bets on mortgages not backed by federal agencies and on commercial real estate derivatives.

    There are four plans in Nebraska's Educational Savings Plan Trust. Osborn is the program trustee, responsible for administration, operation and maintenance.


    There's no doubt that Osborn has done a good job of self-promotion in his term as State Treasurer.  Normally, it's just annoying because you know that these politicians are advancing their own careers on the taxpayers' dime (looking at you, Jon Bruning and Mike Foley).  But, here, Osborn's desperation for headlines actually ended up hurting Nebraskans because he went for flash over substance in managing the state's college savings program.  Sure, no family was ever forced to put their money into these questionable funds, but its unfathomable that Osborn would even open the program to these sorts of risky investments.  This program is designed to fund Nebraska children's college educations.  Those children deserved responsible management by their trustee - not Shane Osborn's imagining himself the financial equivalent of Maverick from Top Gun.
    --------------

    So, has Osborn's record hurt the State Treasurer's office?  Could it have hurt the office so much that it will actually result in the position's elimination?  We'll be getting a sense of those answers in the coming months.  Personally, if it appears on the November ballot, I expect to vote against this amendment and for keeping the State Treasurer's position.  But, I'd certainly understand why Nebraskans would vote otherwise if they don't believe we can do better than Shane Osborn.
    Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
    Print Friendly View Send As Email
    Share on FB
    Tweet This

    New Nebraska Network
    Not Just Red to Blue - More than One Label for Another


    Active Users
    Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

    Menu

    Make a New Account

    Username:

    Password:



    Forget your username or password?


    NNN on Twitter

    102nd Legislature

    Progressive Partners
  • Nebraskans For Civic Reform
  • Coalition For Lifesaving Cures
  • Nebraskans For Obama
  • Bold Nebraska
  • Nebraska Democratic Party
  • Nebraska Young Democrats
  • Nebraskans for Peace
  • Center for Rural Affairs
  • Nebraska Appleseed Center
  • Center for People in Need
  • ACLU Nebraska
  • Sierra Club Nebraska
  • Common Cause Nebraska
  • Voices For Children
  • Opportunity@Work
  • Power Up Nebraska

  • Politicians & Candidates
  • Ben Nelson for Senate (D)
  • John Ewing for Congress (D-02)
  • Gwen Howard for Congress (D-02)
  • Jon Bruning for Senate (R)
  • Deb Fischer for Senate(R)
  • Don Stenberg for Senate (R)
  • Lee Terry for Congress (R-02)
  • Brett Lindstrom for Cong. (R-02)
  • Jack Heidel for Congress (R-02)
  • Sen. Ben Nelson (D)
  • Sen. Mike Johanns (R)
  • Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-01)
  • Rep. Lee Terry (R-02)
  • Rep. Adrian Smith (R-03)
  • Governor's Office
  • Atty General's Office
  • Sec. of State's Office
  • Unicameral Directory
  • Mayor Jim Suttle (D, Omaha)
  • Mayor Chris Beutler (D, Lincoln)
  • Nebraska Democratic Party
  • Nebraska Green Party
  • Nebraska Republican Party

  • Local Media
  • Nebraska State Paper
  • Prairie Fire
  • The Reader
  • North Platte Bulletin
  • Sandhills Express
  • Southwest Nebraska News
  • NET Nebraska Public Radio
  • KFAB Talk Radio (Omaha)
  • KLIN Talk Radio (Lincoln)
  • Channel 3 - CBS (Omaha)
  • Channel 4 - ABC (Kearney)
  • Channel 5 - NBC (Hastings)
  • Channel 6 - NBC (Omaha)
  • Channel 7 - ABC (Omaha)
  • Channel 8 - ABC (Lincoln)
  • Channel 10 - CBS (Lincoln)
  • Channel 42 - Fox (Omaha)

  • Submit a Letter to the Editor
  • Omaha World-Herald
  • Lincoln Journal-Star
  • Daily Nebraskan (UNL)
  • Grand Island Independent
  • Kearney Hub
  • North Platte Telegraph
  • Norfolk Daily News
  • Fremont Tribune
  • Columbus Telegram
  • McCook Daily Gazette
  • Scottsbluff Star-Herald
  • Hastings Tribune

  • Powered by: SoapBlox