About NNN
Since March 2005, New Nebraska Network has been Nebraska's online voice for progressive political change. Thank you for being part of the NNN community!

Managing Editor:
Kyle Michaelis,
kyle@newnebraska.net

NNN is a meritocracy. Contribute and you will be rewarded.


Join the Network

Subscribe: RSS Front

Subscribe: RSS Diaries

Subscribe: By E-mail

NNN on Facebook

NNN on Twitter

Read NNN Archives
(pre-August 2007)

Poll
How does Jon Bruning come back from losing election based on ethics and character issues?
He doesn't. He's done.
Don't know but got plenty of $$$ to keep spirit up
May be done climbing but AG as long as he wants it
Not a problem. Will declare for Governor 2014 soon

Results

Search




Advanced Search


Local Blog Roll
  • Running Chicken
  • Flag On The Play
  • Progressive Oasis
  • Bold Nebraska - News
  • Aksarbent
  • NE Appleseed Blog
  • Blog for Rural America
  • Neal Obermeyer 'Toons
  • Paul Fell Cartoons
  • Bill Dunn Cartoons
  • The State Line (OWH)
  • The Hall (OWH)
  • Nebraska Watchdog
  • NE Greensprouts
  • Revolution-21
  • Leavenworth Street
  • Objective Conservative
  • Grassroots In NE
  • Winterized
  • Harold W. Andersen
  • Red State Report
  • Right-Wing Professor
  • Omaha Liberal Examiner
  • Today On The Lege
  • BJ Nebraska
  • Lincolnite
  • Rise of the Center
  • Mark Fahleson
  • Red State Eclectic
  • Heartland Notebook
  • Conservative Examiner
  • Republican Examiner
  • Nebraska Outback
  • Economic Trends
  • Art Diamond Blog
  • Vital Signs
  • Domestic Divapalooza
  • Omaha TV News

  • 50 State Blog Network
  • Alabama
  • Arizona
  • California
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • DailyKos
  • Firedoglake
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Idaho
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Iowa
  • Louisiana
  • Maine
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • Missouri
  • Montana
  • MyDD
  • Nebraska
  • Nevada
  • New Hampshire
  • New Jersey
  • New Mexico
  • New York (a)
  • New York (b)
  • North Carolina
  • North Dakota
  • Ohio (a)
  • Ohio (b)
  • Oklahoma
  • Open Left
  • Oregon
  • Pennsylvania
  • Rhode Island
  • Swing State Project
  • Tennessee
  • Texas (a)
  • Texas (b)
  • Utah
  • Vermont
  • Virginia
  • Washington
  • West Virginia
  • Wisconsin

  • Jim Suttle Needs To Take Another Look At Sewer Tax Numbers

    by: Kyle Michaelis

    Wed Jan 27, 2010 at 00:35:28 AM CST


    A large part of Omaha Mayor Jim Suttle's appeal is that he's supposed to be an engineer rather than a politician.  Sadly, it appears he's moving away from that promise with his recent posturing against State Senator Tom White and his bill to exempt certain utility fees from the sales tax.  

    Although it's broader in construction and would exempt any utilities fees collected for infrastructure replacement, the motive behind White's bill (LB952) is to prevent the double-taxation of Omaha residents who are picking up the tab for a multi-billion dollar sewer improvement project mandated by the federal government.  Whether the costs of this federal mandate are considered a true tax or not, the end result is the same for the people who are paying the bill.  Recognizing that additional state and local taxes shouldn't be tacked onto these fees, 15 State Senators have already cosponsored White's legislation - most from the Omaha-metro area.

    Now, it's important to note that the city of Omaha is in the middle of a budget crisis with no end in sight.  Mayor Suttle's faced a terrible predicament in the city's finances since the first day he took office and has so far found little assistance from the Legislature.  In fact, Suttle's hope that city voters might be allowed to consider raising the sales tax by an additional half-cent died this year without such a bill even being introduced.

    After that rejection, it probably shouldn't surprise that Suttle would resent any action by the Legislature cutting into potential revenue that the city desperately needs.  There's a lot to be said for the possibility that any lost revenue is only going to increase the burden on local property owners in the form of higher property taxes.  It's this shift onto property taxes that Suttle is struggling to avoid - or, at least, to minimize.  Still, in this instance, Suttle is just plain wrong to oppose White's sales tax exemption.  Suttle is being petty, short-sighted, and self-serving - all things you'd expect from a politician but not from a man who campaigned on his engineers' approach to problem-solving.

    If Suttle were remaining true to this approach, you'd expect him to focus on the numbers.  You'd expect him to focus on dollars and cents, while maximizing the benefit for the people of Omaha.  Instead, he's willfully blinded himself to any concern but the immediate political consequences of a 3-cent hike in the property tax required to make up the anticipated loss in sales tax revenue.  

    This is where Suttle appears to be shamelessly turning his back on his training as an engineer and his responsibility to the people of Omaha.  With sales taxes, almost four dollars go to the state for every one dollar received by the city of Omaha.  Yes, there's long-standing dissatisfaction over high property taxes in Omaha - as is the case all across the state.  But, that doesn't mean anyone in their right mind would prefer to pay five dollars to the government in other taxes and fees rather than a single dollar more in local property taxes.

    No tax exists in a vacuum.  Suttle understood this when he wrote in a letter to White that his bill would really be "a tax shift."  This is a familiar argument - and not one wholly without merit.  However, the shift away from the sales tax could go towards a number of other potential sources of revenue besides the property tax.  The real tax shift in White's bill is geographic - offering relief to Omaha-area taxpayers from an unfair share of state government's expenses.  Suttle should recognize that this frees up resources at the local level rather than foolishly embracing a status quo that overburdens his own constituents.

    I'm not saying that Suttle would have an easy sell in convincing Omaha taxpayers that other taxes and fees would be acceptable because of this sales tax exemption.  But, the numbers don't lie.  Dollar-for-dollar, there's no doubt the city and the surrounding communities benefit from keeping that money closer to home rather than sending it off to Lincoln never to be seen again.  And, whatever form it takes, we're talking fewer dollars in total tax as well.  All it takes is a Mayor able to communicate and to make his case - which Suttle should already be laying the groundwork for rather than going off half-cocked with criticism of White and LB952.

    Suttle's attempt to lay any future property tax increase at White's door is an especially disturbing example of internecine warfare in light of fellow Democrat White's campaign for Congress against Republican Lee Terry.  This is a gift to Terry, plain and simple.  No matter what animosity may exist between Suttle and White, this is a clear betrayal of the many Democrats who've supported both.

    To put it back on the path to fiscal responsibility, the city of Omaha needs someone looking at its problems from more than just a political perspective.  That's what Suttle promised on the campaign trail, and I still have hope it's what he will deliver.  But, right now, he's carrying water for Gov. Dave Heineman, allowing he and his legislative allies to pad the state budget with the people of Omaha's paychecks because it's easier than doing the hard work of leading.  Omaha deserves better, and Tom White deserves an apology.

    Kyle Michaelis :: Jim Suttle Needs To Take Another Look At Sewer Tax Numbers
    Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
    Print Friendly View Send As Email
    Share on FB
    Tweet This

    Federal Mandates. (0.00 / 0)
    The sewer seperation mandate is one that should have been planned for for at least 40 years.  Long before either Suttle or White were on the scene.

    How long did the past Mayors and members of the Omaha Ciy Council think it would be acceptable to use the basements of residents in North Omaha as a holding tank for sewage over-flow durring rain storms, or the Missouri River as a dumping spot?

    Sewar usage fees and property taxes should have been raised many years ago to pay for this project.  It should never have come down to a fight over sales taxes.

    That being said, White probably had some obligation to ask the elected officials of Omaha how they wanted to handle what past administrations had allowed to become a crisis.  I don't support most sales taxes, but Whites unilateral action was a typical politicians pandering stance to a situation where he thinks he can gain some political capital for "cutting" taxes.  The bottom line is the sewer seperation has to be done, and it has to be paid for.

    The people of Omaha are damned lucky to have an engineer over-seeing this kind of project.  Suttle's training will save them millions in the long run.  It's too damned bad that he also has to worry about fighting lawyers who's tallents aren't as well suited to completing construction projects as they are to shifting blame.  Maybe White should have proposed a bill that rebated all the sales taxes collected by the state back to Omaha to help pay for the project instead of just doing what was in his own best interests.


    Laughable Suttle Engineering Management Skills (0.00 / 0)
    The idea that Jim Suttle has any public utility infrastructure design or management skills or ability is laughable.  Here's a much lower cost suggestion for solving the sewage in my basement problem in those parts of city where the sanitary and storm sewers are not separate, install backflow preventers at each residential/commercial connection location.  Then let MUD take its time replacing gas, water and waste water subsystems as capital is available.  Ignore the EPA mandate unless/until the Feds agree to return some of NE's own federal tax dollars to pay for their mandate.  If you do a little research on the backflow preventers, you'll see they are a very cost effective means of solving the worst of the local problems.  Just please keep Jim Suttle away from any engineering or construction plans/projects.

    [ Parent ]
    It won't work... (0.00 / 0)
    Installing back flow devices may be a temporary fix for individual sites, but every gallon of waste has to go some place and anything that doesn't go into someones basement goes directly into the Missouri.  And as much as you'd like to think that is
    a very cost effective means of solving the worst of the local problems.
    it's still a health hazard to everyone down stream.

    Suttle served as Chairman of the Nebraska Board of Engineers and Architects.  His firm is recognized in international engineering circles.  Your gas bag attitude and idiotic solution to the problem demonstrate clearly that you don't know what the hell you're talking about.


    [ Parent ]
    Actually... (0.00 / 0)
    "Ignore the EPA mandate unless/until the Feds agree to return some of NE's own federal tax dollars to pay for their mandate."

    This is not true. Follow this link here and it will show Nebraska gets more in federal spending that we put into the pot. ( I couldn't find anything for city specific amounts, if you can and post them many thanks).



    [ Parent ]
    hmmm... (0.00 / 0)
    Interesting. Senator Nelson has been securing federal funds to pay for this mandate for the last 8 years through the appropriations process.

    At one point, Lee Terry partnered with him - seeking the funds on the House side while Nelson did on the Senate side. Then Lee went on his wandering acid trip on earmarks (he was for them before he was against them before he was for them). Lee abandoned Omaha on this project, transportation, research, brownfield cleanups and countless other projects when he shirked his responsibilities.

    But what is really interesting is that Nelson has been attacked by some here for securing funds against another unfunded mandate - ensuring that 20,000 disadvantaged children would have access to health care. Maybe some federal mandates are better paid by local taxpayers? or should Nelson countinue to fight for federal funds for health care and sewer seperation despite the criticisms and while Lee gets a free pass for abandoning Omaha?


    [ Parent ]
    Eventually the bills have to be paid... (0.00 / 0)
    It's not even fair to call this situation an unfunded federal mandate.  It's a case of the Federal Government having to legislate common sense solutions that local governmental bodies should have been enforcing for the past hundred years.  Earmarks to get federal funds to pay for it amount to more subsides to pay for the theft that local land developers have engaged in at the expense of the general public.

    The sanitary and storm sewer separation mandate that Omaha is finding so difficult to deal with is not a problem that couldn't have been foreseen.  By 1900 it was well recognized that the single biggest danger to safe water supplies was human waste.  Many municipalities were already routinely laying out separate sanitary and storm sewer drainage systems by that time.

    In booming metropolitan areas of the country common knowledge and safety and health concerns for the general public were set aside because eliminating the added expense of doing what was the right and reasonable thing cut into the profit margins of the land developers.  If you check the list of past elected officials in any area that has under gone rapid expansion it's no coincidence that the rolls are dominated by real estate developers and their lawyers.  By monopolizing the political structure of cities the real estate developers managed to prevent minimum standards in codes from being enacted that might cut into their profit margins.

    Omaha and Lincoln are no exceptions.  Sewer separation is an area that most people are totally unaware of (and don't understand) since it's something they never physically see.  Tax payers are constantly being forced to pick up the costs for the city to acquire enough land to do street widening projects that were very predictable at the time the subdivisions they are in were admitted to the city.  Both situations are the result of electing a few greedy foxes to guard the hen house.

    Instead of attack Jim Suttle for doing what he has to, maybe someone should point a finger at Hal Daub for squandering all that cash on a convention center, and Mike Fahey for building a baseball stadium when the city needed to spend all that money on basic infrastructure.


    [ Parent ]
    New Nebraska Network
    Not Just Red to Blue - More than One Label for Another


    Active Users
    Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

    Menu

    Make a New Account

    Username:

    Password:



    Forget your username or password?


    NNN on Twitter

    102nd Legislature

    Progressive Partners
  • Nebraskans For Civic Reform
  • Coalition For Lifesaving Cures
  • Nebraskans For Obama
  • Bold Nebraska
  • Nebraska Democratic Party
  • Nebraska Young Democrats
  • Nebraskans for Peace
  • Center for Rural Affairs
  • Nebraska Appleseed Center
  • Center for People in Need
  • ACLU Nebraska
  • Sierra Club Nebraska
  • Common Cause Nebraska
  • Voices For Children
  • Opportunity@Work
  • Power Up Nebraska

  • Politicians & Candidates
  • Ben Nelson for Senate (D)
  • John Ewing for Congress (D-02)
  • Gwen Howard for Congress (D-02)
  • Jon Bruning for Senate (R)
  • Deb Fischer for Senate(R)
  • Don Stenberg for Senate (R)
  • Lee Terry for Congress (R-02)
  • Brett Lindstrom for Cong. (R-02)
  • Jack Heidel for Congress (R-02)
  • Sen. Ben Nelson (D)
  • Sen. Mike Johanns (R)
  • Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-01)
  • Rep. Lee Terry (R-02)
  • Rep. Adrian Smith (R-03)
  • Governor's Office
  • Atty General's Office
  • Sec. of State's Office
  • Unicameral Directory
  • Mayor Jim Suttle (D, Omaha)
  • Mayor Chris Beutler (D, Lincoln)
  • Nebraska Democratic Party
  • Nebraska Green Party
  • Nebraska Republican Party

  • Local Media
  • Nebraska State Paper
  • Prairie Fire
  • The Reader
  • North Platte Bulletin
  • Sandhills Express
  • Southwest Nebraska News
  • NET Nebraska Public Radio
  • KFAB Talk Radio (Omaha)
  • KLIN Talk Radio (Lincoln)
  • Channel 3 - CBS (Omaha)
  • Channel 4 - ABC (Kearney)
  • Channel 5 - NBC (Hastings)
  • Channel 6 - NBC (Omaha)
  • Channel 7 - ABC (Omaha)
  • Channel 8 - ABC (Lincoln)
  • Channel 10 - CBS (Lincoln)
  • Channel 42 - Fox (Omaha)

  • Submit a Letter to the Editor
  • Omaha World-Herald
  • Lincoln Journal-Star
  • Daily Nebraskan (UNL)
  • Grand Island Independent
  • Kearney Hub
  • North Platte Telegraph
  • Norfolk Daily News
  • Fremont Tribune
  • Columbus Telegram
  • McCook Daily Gazette
  • Scottsbluff Star-Herald
  • Hastings Tribune

  • Powered by: SoapBlox