About NNN
Since March 2005, New Nebraska Network has been the state's premier source of progressive online political commentary and community-building.

Please support our efforts by becoming engaged, spreading the word, and contributing what you can towards our continued growth as a voice for change in Nebraska politics.


Join the Network

Frontpage RSS Feed

Diaries RSS Feed

Daily E-mail Updates

Read NNN Archives
(pre-August 2007)

Managing Editor:
Kyle Michaelis,
kyle@newnebraska.net

NNN is a meritocracy. Contribute and you will be rewarded.

Poll
Settle this one between NNN and the NDP: which is the catchier name for Nebraska's Republican governor?
"Deficit Dave"
"Handout Heineman"
I like'em both

Results

Search




Advanced Search


Event Calendar
March 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 * * *
<< (add event) >>

Local Blog Roll
  • NDP Blog for Nebraska
  • Cartoons by Neal Obermeyer
  • Brynn Jacobs @ DI
  • Cartoons by Bill Dunn
  • Midwest Democrat
  • Blog for Rural America
  • Omaha Blog
  • Freedom Road Project
  • Lincolnite
  • Eye On Omaha
  • Public Christian
  • Nebraska Blue
  • The Dark Stuff
  • Revolution-21
  • The Watchdog Post
  • Scenic Route (GI Ind.)
  • City Weekly Media Watch
  • Omaha TV News
  • Harold W. Andersen
  • Nebraska Watchdog
  • Leavenworth Street
  • Objective Conservative
  • Red State Eclectic
  • Heartland Notebook
  • Weird Harold
  • Joe's Shack
  • Check With Chip
  • Don't Let Me Stop You
  • High Plains Patriot
  • Guerilla Spot
  • The Ag Blog
  • Nebraska Pulse
  • Economic Trends
  • Right-Wing Professor
  • Art Diamond
  • Vital Signs
  • Unicam Watch (Right-Wing)
  • Patriotic Resistance (Anti-Obama)
  • Mark Fahleson - NE GOP

  • 50 State Blog Network
  • Alabama
  • Arizona
  • California
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • DailyKos
  • Firedoglake
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Idaho
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Iowa
  • Louisiana
  • Maine
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • Missouri
  • Montana
  • MyDD
  • Nebraska
  • Nevada
  • New Hampshire
  • New Jersey
  • New Mexico
  • New York (a)
  • New York (b)
  • North Carolina
  • North Dakota
  • Ohio (a)
  • Ohio (b)
  • Oklahoma
  • Open Left
  • Oregon
  • Pennsylvania
  • Rhode Island
  • Swing State Project
  • Tennessee
  • Texas (a)
  • Texas (b)
  • Utah
  • Vermont
  • Virginia
  • Washington
  • West Virginia
  • Wisconsin

  • Nebraska Catholic Conference Calls For Unconscionable "Conscience Clause"

    by: Kyle Michaelis

    Mon Jun 22, 2009 at 21:17:39 PM CDT


    I am a Nebraska Catholic, and - since reading the following story in the Lincoln Journal-Star - I have been ashamed of our local religious leaders for their betrayal of everything that is good and right in the Church's teachings:
    The debate over sexual orientation and religious conviction has spilled over into state rules for licensed psychologists.

    Psychologists should be able to refuse to treat - and refuse to refer clients - because of religious or moral convictions, Jim Cunningham, executive director of the Nebraska Catholic Conference, said during a licensing rules hearing Thursday.  The conference also supports a similar "convictions of conscience" rule for licensed counselors, social workers and marriage and family therapists.

    Without any conscience clause, Catholic Charities in Omaha and Catholic Social Services in Lincoln might have to stop hiring licensed counselors and psychologists, Cunningham said. The Lincoln agency provides about $100,000 in free mental health services, he said Thursday.

    While most ethics codes for professional counselors and psychologists allow professionals to refuse to offer services based on ethical or moral convictions, the codes generally require the professional to refer the client.  But even referring clients could be a violation of conscience when the service violates moral or religious convictions, Cunningham said.....

    Without a moral exemption, a psychologist who believes homosexual relationships are immoral might be required to counsel homosexual couples on building a better relationship, said Edward Stringham, a Lincoln psychologist....

    But another Lincoln psychologist said the conviction of conscience language opens a Pandora's box.  It could allow any provider to discriminate against virtually anyone -as long as they claim a conflicting moral or religious belief, said James K. Cole, who represented the Nebraska Psychology Association at the hearing.

    There have been no known problems nationally or in Nebraska with claims that psychologists are forced to compromise moral or religious values because of the national ethics code requiring them to help refer a client, he said.


    I weep for my Church.  That is neither metaphor nor hyperbole.  A Catholic Church that lobbies and fights for the right to turn its back on those in need is not the Church in which I was raised.  Nor is it the Church in which I believe.

    What is saddest about this whole situation is that the Nebraska Catholic Conference isn't just some outside group abusing the Church's name to serve a reactionary, right-wing political agenda.  This is an actual body within the Church that doesn't adopt any policy or take any position without support from each of Nebraska's three Bishops.

    It is morally repugnant to suggest that providing a simple referral to someone in need could ever be a violation of conscience.  Those who would claim as much are only proving their own lack of conscience - and shouldn't be practicing their diseased form of mental health care in the first place.  That the Nebraska Catholic Conference would even stoop to threatening an end to their services if they don't get their way is just further proof of how deep the rot has taken hold.

    You want to know the principles that guide me as a Catholic.  Here's some good examples:

    Fundamental to Catholic tradition and teaching are a belief in and commitment to the inherent dignity of every human being--the clearest reflection of God among us....

    Scripture teaches that God has special concern for the poor and vulnerable....All persons are entitled to participate in society in a manner which acknowledges and respects their dignity as members of the human community.....

    Health care is a basic human right which flows form the sanctity of human life.  The public-policy process is challenged to ensure that all persons have access to adequate health care.....

    Every person has a right not only to life and bodily integrity but also to the means that are necessary and suitable for the proper development of life - among these is the right to necessary health care.


    Each of these principles is declared on none other than the Nebraska Catholic Conference's own website.  Here, they also declare:
    The Nebraska Catholic Conference represents a tradition which opposes oppression, exploitation, discrimination, and disrespect.  The Conference is an advocate for social policies and conditions which promote justice and bolster the dignity and value of each person.

    What we see in the Nebraska Catholic Conference's call for a "conscience clause" is a clear betrayal of the very tradition they claim to uphold.  They are asking for the right to discriminate.  They have positioned themselves as advocates for injustice.  Their demand alone is disrespectful and degrading to those deemed unfit to serve - casting stones as if they were somehow above sin.

    Unfortunately, the Board of Mental Health Practice appears to have buckled to the Nebraka Catholic Conference's demands for a so-called "conscience clause" where counselors are concerned.  But, so far, they've at least shown more fortitude against such an unconsciounable rules change for actual psychologists.  For their sake, for the sake of those in need of mental health care, and for the sake of our local Catholic Church leaders who have so surely lost their way, let us pray that strength continues.

    Kyle Michaelis :: Nebraska Catholic Conference Calls For Unconscionable "Conscience Clause"
    Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
    Print Friendly View Send As Email
    huh? (0.00 / 0)
    I'm a bit puzzled by this. If, for some strange reason, a homosexual couple went to the Church for counseling on building better relationship, wouldn't the Church want to counsel chastity as part of that relationship? By refusing to treat someone, you give up the ability to have any influence at all.

    First, (0.00 / 0)
    in response to Eric, Catholic Charities deals with anyone who is in need, and is really, one of the premier charities and family service organizations in Omaha, many if not most of their clients, are not Catholic, and Catholic Charities does not try and convert them from their own faiths. Secondly, the counseling provided through CC is not done by priests, therefore it is not necessarily doctrinally based.

    _______

    There is an unfortunate misunderstanding in the Catholic, and Christian faith about homosexuality. While homosexual acts are a sin (according to the Catholic Catechism), being a homosexual is not, nor is being in a chaste homosexual relationship. The sin exists in the sexual acts. These sexual sins of homosexuality are also equal in standing to the sins of heterosexual couples who engage in premarital sex, adultery, etc.

    On this issue of the "Conscience Clause": Bigotry, xenophobia, homophobia, and misunderstanding of ones faith are all at work here surely. However, any person who has not sworn an oath to take care of someone no matter their personal beliefs, etc, is entitled to their understanding of the tenants of their own faiths and if those tenants conflict with their profession, they should be protected under their constitutional right of free association from having to preform any acts or duties or procedures which come into conflict with that association.

    Furthermore, as those rights should apply to a person, so should they apply to any organization (i.e. Catholic Charities), which is doctrinally-based.

    Finally, anyone refusing such services and is doing so through the use of Federal, State, or other governmental funds, should be required to provide proof of their claim if their inaction or refusal is contested.    


    where is the conflict? (0.00 / 0)
    I am familiar with Catholic charities, and I wasn't suggesting that they try to convert their clients, and I'm not suggesting that the counseling is done by priests or based in religion. I'm suggesting that counselors can and do treat patients in ways that do not conflict with their consciences, and I would think that the Church would want to support this kind of counseling rather than refusing said clients.

    Does anyone actually have an example of where a psychiatrist is professionally bound to counsel a patient to perform a particular kind of sexual act? Is a psychiatrist ever bound to not counsel against an action that he or she views as unhealthy? I'm just not seeing where this conflict actually comes up in practice. I just don't think that this is the same as a physician refusing to perform an abortion or a pharmacist refusing to dispense birth control.


    [ Parent ]
    Bigotry, Prejudice And Hate Are Equal Opportunity Offenders (0.00 / 0)
    This has been news to me since the first story broke and I'm still disgusted/upset by this line of logic these heritics have.  It never makes sense to me that one's advocation of the open discrimination towards Gay Nebraskans doesn't affect them personally?  It's like their immune, or perhaps blind, to their own biases.  Well this time it's down right absurd to say that denying services or referrals to openly gay people in need of a therapist goes against their conscience even though such mental health services benefit someone's family member, close friend, neighbor down the block, a co-worker in the office, a school kid and even a fellow member of a religious faith.  How pious is that!  It makes me wonder if such hypocrites figure it out one day that they do indeed love someone who is homosexual, irregardless of what ever faith view-point a person may hold.  
    It is as simple as saying that Gay Nebraskans are your family members, friends, neighbors, etc, etc....  
    We have every right to be treated fairly and equally along with our heterosexual brothers, sisters and peers.  But no, life isn't that way here in 'Neighborly Nebraska.'  And you know it's bad if a Nebraskan thinks Iowa looks tempting to move to!  However, I'm a Husker.  Not a Hawkeye, or Cyclone.  I'm always reminded of that fact when I go to Omaha (which almost should be Iowa).  Anyways, I digress.  Point is Nebraskans should be advocating for equitable rights towards its LGBT population as it does with the rest of the citizenry.  One good step would be to elect more openly Gay Nebraskans, in their communities, to public office-at all levels.  Iowa has done that in the last decade and look at the difference now.  At least I live in a city where there is one person I can look up to, however I wish I could say the same with the ones who remain to be unknown.

    As I said before to stubborn people, patience is a virtue but I get the sense about the urgency of now.  Maybe it's wise to be balanced, keeping those two things in mind.  I'll let you in on what I love about Nebraska the most.  The two quotes that are on the side of the Capitol.  One, as you all know, is "Equality Before the Law," and the other is "The Salvation of the State Lies in the Watchfulness of its Citizens."  That's why I'm a Nebraskan cause I keep those two statments close to heart.


    New Nebraska Network
    Not Just Red to Blue - More than One Label for Another


    Active Users
    Currently 2 user(s) logged on.

    Menu

    Make a New Account

    Username:

    Password:



    Forget your username or password?


    "NNN Live" Returns - Sunday, March 14th, 10 pm CST
    NNN on Twitter

    101st Legislature

    Progressive Partners
  • Coalition For Lifesaving Cures
  • Nebraskans For Obama
  • Change That Works - Nebraska
  • Nebraska Democratic Party
  • Nebraska Young Democrats
  • Nebraskans for Peace
  • Center for Rural Affairs
  • Nebraska Appleseed Center
  • Center for People in Need
  • ACLU Nebraska
  • Sierra Club Nebraska
  • Common Cause Nebraska
  • Voices For Children
  • Opportunity@Work
  • Power Up Nebraska

  • Politicians & Candidates
  • Tom White for Congress (D-02)
  • Lee Terry for Congress (R-02)
  • Rebekah Davis for Congress (D-03)
  • Adrian Smith for Congress (R-03)
  • Sen. Ben Nelson (D)
  • Sen. Mike Johanns (R)
  • Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-01)
  • Rep. Lee Terry (R-02)
  • Rep. Adrian Smith (R-03)
  • Gov. Dave Heineman (R)
  • Atty Gen Jon Bruning (R)
  • Unicameral Directory
  • Mayor Jim Suttle (D, Omaha)
  • Mayor Chris Beutler (D, Lincoln)
  • Nebraska Democratic Party
  • Nebraska Green Party
  • Nebraska Republican Party
  • Heineman for Governor (R)
  • Bruning for Atty Gen (R)

  • Local Media
  • Nebraska State Paper
  • Prairie Fire
  • The Reader
  • North Platte Bulletin
  • Sandhills Express
  • Southwest Nebraska News
  • NET Nebraska Public Radio
  • KFAB Talk Radio (Omaha)
  • KLIN Talk Radio (Lincoln)
  • Channel 3 - CBS (Omaha)
  • Channel 4 - ABC (Kearney)
  • Channel 5 - NBC (Hastings)
  • Channel 6 - NBC (Omaha)
  • Channel 7 - ABC (Omaha)
  • Channel 8 - ABC (Lincoln)
  • Channel 10 - CBS (Lincoln)
  • Channel 42 - Fox (Omaha)

  • Submit a Letter to the Editor
  • Omaha World-Herald
  • Lincoln Journal-Star
  • Daily Nebraskan (UNL)
  • Grand Island Independent
  • Kearney Hub
  • North Platte Telegraph
  • Norfolk Daily News
  • Fremont Tribune
  • Columbus Telegram
  • McCook Daily Gazette
  • Scottsbluff Star-Herald
  • Hastings Tribune

  • Powered by: SoapBlox